Transformation

The Evolution of Building Cleaning

From daredevil rope-climbers to precision drones — how facade maintenance is finally catching up with the 21st century.

How We Got Here

Late 1800s

The Daredevil Era

Window cleaning began with simple ropes and Bosun's chairs borrowed from ship rigging. Workers — known as "daredevil cleaners" — had nothing more than a bucket, a squeegee, and a leather strap.

Early 1900s

Rise of the Skyscraper

As towering skyscrapers changed city skylines, architects introduced roof anchors and mechanical cradles. Fixed Building Maintenance Units (BMUs) became the standard for tall buildings.

1950s – 1970s

Electrically Powered Scaffolds

Suspended scaffolds — also called "swinging stages" — brought electric power to the process, but workers remained exposed to height, wind, and weather risks.

2000s – Present

Modern BMUs & Swinging Stages

BMUs gained features like telescopic arms, but the core method remained unchanged. Not every building can afford permanent BMUs, so swinging stages are still widespread. The industry has been essentially static for decades.

Now

The Drone Revolution

Pioneered in Europe and Asia, drone-based cleaning is the first real paradigm shift in over a century. Companies like LucidBots in the US have proven the concept. BlueHorizon brings it to Australia — safer, faster, cheaper, and better for everyone involved.

Why Traditional Methods Fall Short

⚠ Safety Risks

Workers face prolonged exposure to rain, wind, and extreme heights. High-rise window cleaning remains one of the most injury-prone trades in construction.

⏱ Slow Repositioning

Traditional lifts allow only about 6 metres of horizontal coverage before the entire platform must be lowered and repositioned — wasting hours per building.

🏗 Heavy Equipment

Swinging stages, aerial lifts, and scaffolds require large crews, extensive setup time, and significant logistics before any cleaning even begins.

🚧 Public Disruption

Footpath closures, noise, visual clutter, and privacy disturbances affect tenants, businesses, and pedestrians around the building.

Traditional vs Drone Method

For a typical 8-storey commercial building

Traditional Method

  • Time on site: 3 days
  • Crew size: 4–6 operators
  • Total cost: $8,000 – $12,000

BlueHorizon Drones

  • Time on site: 1 day
  • Crew size: 2 operators
  • Total cost: $4,000 – $8,000
60–80%
Time Reduction
90%
Safety Improvement
~50%
Cost Savings

Sydney's Building Landscape

City of Sydney Housing Audit 2024

The City of Sydney contains 22,666 buildings total, with approximately 97.7% falling into four key categories.

Terraces, townhouses, and semi-detached buildings make up 78% of stock. Multi-storey apartment buildings account for 10% — translating to over 2,266 towers that need regular facade maintenance.

Sydney and Parramatta LGAs top Australia's list for high-rise density, with 35,889 and 13,955 high-rise homes respectively. This concentration creates a massive, underserved market for efficient building cleaning services.

Glass-facade buildings are our primary target — they require the most frequent maintenance and are ideally suited to drone-based cleaning technology.

22,666 Total Buildings in City of Sydney
78% Terrace / Townhouse / Semi-Detached
2,266+ Multi-Storey Apartment Towers
35,889 High-Rise Homes in Sydney LGA

See the difference drones can make for your building.

Request a free assessment and discover how much time and cost you'll save.

Get Your Free Quote